Page 28 of 32

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 18 Apr 2016 12:25
by Paris_Hilton
on the FR forum there are several contests. Like Max dmg but kill only 5 tanks in a t5 tank (i did a 2700 dmg 5kills KV round)

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 18 Apr 2016 14:09
by H311fi5h
There is one from WG, one from PHJ, the one from AgingJedi just finished... Pretty much every CC has something going (although most of them are already done - there were like 50 Types given away on twitch this weekend)

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 18 Apr 2016 16:27
by McMokka
phpBB [video]

seems like the chieftain has no prem goldincome :|

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 18 Apr 2016 16:34
by Dr_Oolen
McMokka wrote:
phpBB [video]

seems like the chieftain has no prem goldincome :|

wut, fekin faggets

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 01 May 2016 19:18
by RedlineRailgunningRemmel
Is it worth getting the Waffel for the Grille 15?

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 01 May 2016 20:18
by Alm1ghtyArtur
Remmke wrote:Is it worth getting the Waffel for the Grille 15?


Only if you liked the RHM, WT PZ4 gameplay, otherwise it's just trash.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 01 May 2016 20:51
by RedlineRailgunningRemmel
Well the Waffel was useless anyway unless you managed to hide the thing for a second clip.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 01 May 2016 20:59
by Dr_Oolen
Ive played some 40 games with it. It definitely is less situational than waffel, and tbh it is not infuriating to play like many other t10 tds, it is actually kinda fun to play. Still i think it is not great. Better than waffel (for those who like consistency), fv4005 and maybe foch/268. The insane dispersion on turret traverse completely fucks up the accuracy when shooting at anything that actually moves. Get it for the sake of getting it? No. Have waffle already - then i guess it will be a slight "upgrade" - if as i said you like consistency over some broken one shot wonder shit.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 01 May 2016 22:33
by Orrie
Hmm, maybe it could be good for missions, since I have it unlocked, but never bought.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 29 Sep 2016 11:55
by Thoryk
This will be gut!

The new gun being tested has now been confirmed as the 15m/45 41st Year Type. It will be added as a gun for the Type 4 & Type 5 Heavy tanks. Their current armaments will also remain. These are the ammo types:

152.4 HIGH-EXPLOSIVE COMMON TYPE O HE
152.4 caliber
30-50 pen
750-1250 dmg
3.66 splash radius

152.4 HIGH-EXPLOSIVE COMMON TYPE 4 HE
152.4 caliber
30-50 pen
975-1625 dmg
3.66 splash radius


Lucky I have the Type5 already in my garage :eggplant:

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 29 Sep 2016 11:59
by Dr_Hamu
1300 avg dmg HE, gg.

But then i wonder when the germans will get their 150mm HE buffed, seeing its a weak 950 dmg

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 29 Sep 2016 12:53
by Sekundenkleber
Thoryk wrote:Lucky I have the Type5 already in my garage :eggplant:

ye, what a 'lucky' guy you are

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 29 Sep 2016 14:57
by Thoryk
Sekundenkleber wrote:
Thoryk wrote:Lucky I have the Type5 already in my garage :eggplant:

ye, what a 'lucky' guy you are


Image

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 29 Sep 2016 20:11
by Winter
Sounds troll, but I imagine the T49 still being more fun to derp around..

Type 4/5 are still huge, slow pieces of shit that get penned way too easily..

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 18 Nov 2016 12:44
by Speshul_Snowflake
Do you think the T26E5 could be a useful tank for skirmishes?

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 18 Nov 2016 12:55
by Dr_Slartibartfart
Katharsis wrote:Do you think the T26E5 could be a useful tank for skirmishes?

it has pretty fucking amazing hull armor, you got a turret thats inpenetrable from the front really, high RoF. pershing mobility. 230 pen, with good dpm. I can see some of these in SH, just not too many as the trading will be poop.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 19 Nov 2016 11:34
by Swoopie
Katharsis wrote:Do you think the T26E5 could be a useful tank for skirmishes?

Yes. If there's any chance of you being able to abuse terrain, you will shit on everyone (Unless arta).

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 19 Nov 2016 12:06
by Speshul_Snowflake
The tank seems to be really nice, but I rather would like to have a normal skin instead of the patriot skin. I'm not sure if I should get it. :/

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 21 Nov 2016 02:22
by Dr_Hamu
Here we go.

What of the swedish tanks are worth playing? Like both T10 are really strong, the Kranvagn as an allpurpose unbalanced tank, and the strv as a T10 LT.

Any impressions/thougts of which ones that are good?

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 21 Nov 2016 09:07
by Dr_Oolen
Im not getting anything if it stays like it is now. All the heavies are so op that they arent even fun to play, all you really do is: drive where you can hide lfp, profit. The tds are just too situational and unreliable. Like literally 50% of the games youd wish you were driving t28/t95/type 5 instead. Siege mode gives pure cancer and pretty much forces you to bushwank and prevents EVERY attempt at active gameplay/flanking, especially in endgame, armor is absolutely unreliable, just one degree of angling means that you get penned by everything rather than nothing. Meh. But people who either sit in one bush whole game and never move and people who prefer having 1 sick opieopie game for every 10 shit games will probably find those TDs worthwhile.