Page 12 of 32
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
22 Dec 2014 20:51by wetlioN
Daedal wrote:So, the new British Td line is here.
I have only one question, Achiles or Firefly?
Achilles is more mobile (but not agile) and accurate, has more camo. Firefly has more armor (at least HE will not pen you...) more agility, more HP and 1 more degree of gundepression.
The DPM is practically the same, view range is also close enough. Mobility would be nice, but I am thinking I would like something sturdier that can also go front line, so I am thinking Firefly.
What are your thoughts?
its t6, dont bother too much
going for achilles, just because i havent noticed the other line and i committed myself with free xping the valentine
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
22 Dec 2014 21:02by Daedal__
veitileiN wrote:its t6, dont bother too much
going for achilles, just because i havent noticed the other line and i committed myself with free xping the valentine
Well it is grinding 60K xp on that thing so i would like to have as much fun as i can while doing it.
Just asking as they both look rather similar.
Either way I will probably free xp the the tanks up to tier 6 (well tier 5 are Sherman and The Td seems slow but good otherwise).
Oh, forgot one more thing, Firefly has better stabilization and can mount Vstab
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
30 Dec 2014 12:51by BeneficialCucumber
The first one I saw ingame
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
30 Dec 2014 13:34by Bowser_nl
Firefly is easily better than the Achilles. Achilles gets rekt by the shitty turret traverse and hull traverse. DPM is pretty much the same but the Firefly can mount Vstab and vents (if you would want to squeeze out more dpm. Problem is, Firefly is a medium tank and not a TD, so if you are not using gold to retrain your crew you will have to drop them back to 80%. I think i might get a Firefly as a keeper tank.
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
30 Dec 2014 16:28by RedlineRailgunningRemmel
Achilles is OK for its tier but nothing special, Challenger is watery diarrhea flowing down from a pile of bullshit stacked so high seals stand in awe by is shittyness.
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
30 Dec 2014 16:34by wetlioN
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
30 Dec 2014 17:12by H311fi5h
Well, I guess the only reason to grind the new line is the Charioteer then.
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
30 Dec 2014 17:15by RedlineRailgunningRemmel
Dont worry the T8 with 268 apcr shells and hesh trolling is quite nice.
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
30 Dec 2014 17:46by Bowser_nl
Remmke wrote:Achilles is OK for its tier but nothing special, Challenger is watery diarrhea flowing down from a pile of bullshit stacked so high seals stand in awe by is shittyness.
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
30 Dec 2014 17:55by RedlineRailgunningRemmel
Too bad 95% of the map i got were city maps.
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
31 Dec 2014 14:33by wetlioN
batchat
still takes forever to get the %s up upwards of 85
still one of the mediums im completely playing without pay2win, makes gut kredit
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
21 Jan 2015 17:16by Bowser_nl
Dat AMX13 57, i will get that thing over the CDC.
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
05 Feb 2015 12:34by wetlioN
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
05 Feb 2015 12:53by Bwargh
veitileiN wrote:
whoz dat chick? looks fcking sexy
Edit : nevermind, just checked FTR
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
21 Feb 2015 04:24by Otto_von_HEATmarck
time to rebuy my 13 90
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
21 Feb 2015 10:39by Thoryk
ottotto wrote:time to rebuy my 13 90
- it’s not yet clear where the AMX-30 “microbranch” will start from
Be careful
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
22 Feb 2015 12:27by hypnotoes
I would be very surprised if it didn't originate from 1390. That's the only tank ro start thw new branch that makes any sense
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
22 Feb 2015 12:41by wetlioN
hypnotoes wrote:I would be very surprised if it didn't originate from 1390. That's the only tank ro start thw new branch that makes any sense
it will most likely start from there, i unchecked accelerated crew training. if not, then i have some free xp to convert
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
22 Feb 2015 12:55by TheGamingLion
hypnotoes wrote:I would be very surprised if it didn't originate from 1390. That's the only tank ro start thw new branch that makes any sense
They'll start it from the 50 100, just to screw with us. Like they always do.
Re: tank discussion
Posted:
22 Feb 2015 14:17by Thoryk
TheGamingLion wrote:hypnotoes wrote:I would be very surprised if it didn't originate from 1390. That's the only tank ro start thw new branch that makes any sense
They'll start it from the 50 100, just to screw with us. Like they always do.
^ This will probably happen.
