Page 6 of 38
Re: stronk games
Posted:
10 Dec 2014 19:26
by AaMelon
Anyways, I am not here to discuss about the mosin, I am here to say that SA is not worth the money with all the bugs and shit
Re: stronk games
Posted:
10 Dec 2014 22:43
by sh4zbot
I'll just leave that here:
R4Z0R49
DayZ Mod Staff
Posted 01 November 2012 - 01:28 PM
Version 1.7.7
* [REMOVED] - M107 and AS50(Banned) from all loot tables and removed all damage from bullets so they do 0 damage even if spawned in.
Which mod did you play?
Re: stronk games
Posted:
10 Dec 2014 22:50
by AaMelon
sh4zbot wrote:I'll just leave that here:
R4Z0R49
DayZ Mod Staff
Posted 01 November 2012 - 01:28 PM
Version 1.7.7
* [REMOVED] - M107 and AS50(Banned) from all loot tables and removed all damage from bullets so they do 0 damage even if spawned in.
Which mod did you play?
Lol, can you read the date? 2012?
It was added back in 2013 July
The original mod has all military weapons from arma 2 (not OA). Learn the difference between those two versions of the game
Re: stronk games
Posted:
10 Dec 2014 23:39
by sh4zbot
this patch got announced in november 2k12, 1.7.7 got released in june 2k13. out of interest, show me the official dayz mod changelog where as50 and m107 are back in?(so you dont just talk but show facts)
Re: stronk games
Posted:
11 Dec 2014 00:02
by AaMelon
Play the game now and see whats in there cpt obvious ;D
Edit; seems like there are official servers running public hives with 50 cals in the game, but that still doesnt change the statement that dayz sa is expensive as fck for what it gives u
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 15:51
by AaMelon
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 16:13
by gigeli
Dat arty view rip off
Damn the clickers will also be a part of this game by the looks of it.
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 16:15
by AaMelon
gigeli wrote:Dat arty view rip off
Damn the clickers will also be a part of this game by the looks of it.
ofc
but tanks have smokescreens they can use to get hidden.
Some high tier tanks also have a radar system which detects ca where an arty shell will hit.
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 16:24
by Bowser_nl
Terrible decision to copy paste WoT arty into AW. It's the worst piece of shit mechanic ever, a missed opportunity to score some good selling points over WoT.
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 16:58
by Kolbur
Pfff, no cruise missiles?
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 16:58
by RedlineRailgunningRemmel
Wow SPGs vs tanks again... lame, lamer, lamest.
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 20:20
by wetlioN
this game is such a total ripoff by the looks of it. how can they create something like this without violating WG rights
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 21:25
by AaMelon
It's a ripoff? No.
It's an improved version of WoT? Pretty much.
The devs saw all the horrible mistakes WG did and pretty much fixed them and improved what WoT had. This is what makes this game so special. It's a game based on the community.
Re: stronk games
Posted:
16 Dec 2014 21:28
by AaMelon
Re: stronk games
Posted:
17 Dec 2014 08:46
by wetlioN
Aa_Melon wrote:It's a ripoff? No.
It's an improved version of WoT? Pretty much.
The devs saw all the horrible mistakes WG did and pretty much fixed them and improved what WoT had. This is what makes this game so special. It's a game based on the community.
they have artillery. your argument is invalid
Re: stronk games
Posted:
17 Dec 2014 10:01
by AaMelon
veitileiN wrote:Aa_Melon wrote:It's a ripoff? No.
It's an improved version of WoT? Pretty much.
The devs saw all the horrible mistakes WG did and pretty much fixed them and improved what WoT had. This is what makes this game so special. It's a game based on the community.
they have artillery. your argument is invalid
Oh cmon, stop with the arty bs. Its childish. I hate skypigs too
Re: stronk games
Posted:
17 Dec 2014 11:19
by Bowser_nl
Aa_Melon wrote:It's a ripoff? No.
It's an improved version of WoT? Pretty much.
The devs saw all the horrible mistakes WG did and pretty much fixed them and improved what WoT had. This is what makes this game so special. It's a game based on the community.
It's a ripoff and you know it. Everything is a giant copy paste, the mechanics, the interface, gameplay. Tell me about these horrible mistakes WG did and how AW does it better? Because all i see is a direct copy with modern tanks.
Re: stronk games
Posted:
17 Dec 2014 11:24
by Chillius
Melon, I cant help but notice that after the outburst and the initial apology, you are slowly creeping back to your original position.
Play the game first, then you can say it is "fixed them and improved what WoT had. This is what makes this game so special.".
Chill out
Re: stronk games
Posted:
17 Dec 2014 11:26
by hypnotoes
Bowser_nl wrote:Aa_Melon wrote:It's a ripoff? No.
It's an improved version of WoT? Pretty much.
The devs saw all the horrible mistakes WG did and pretty much fixed them and improved what WoT had. This is what makes this game so special. It's a game based on the community.
It's a ripoff and you know it. Everything is a giant copy paste, the mechanics, the interface, gameplay. Tell me about these horrible mistakes WG did and how AW does it better? Because all i see is a direct copy with modern tanks.
That's actually my biggest concern.
PVE - I couldn't care less.
Private army research trees - secondary to my enjoyment of the game
gameplay - virtually identical but for what it's worth probably better looking
Do we know anything about the RNG in the game yet?
Re: stronk games
Posted:
17 Dec 2014 11:35
by kihrEx
Meron you're going towards retard again! Fall back to your original state of mind asap!